Home > Press Room > 2006 > Speeches
Speech
“On Social Justice, Community
Outreach and Ethnic Understanding: Building a Stronger America”
Dr. Gabriela Lemus - LULAC
Florida State Convention
May 20, 2006
The world we are facing today is one of
many challenges. We are bombarded with
information and we are bombarded by people’s
opinions. Somewhere along the line, we have to
decide what we believe in and what is important
for us to act on.
When
I read the news these days, I wonder whether we
will ever begin to come back together again as a
nation – it is a difficult question.
The
internet has been a wonderful thing in that it
allows us to dialogue across long distances and
gain access to all types of information, but it
also means that one is far more accessible to
anybody who chooses to “google” one’s name.
There
is a lot of hate out there. According to the
Southern Poverty Law Center: A 5% annual increase in hate groups in 2005 caps a
remarkable rise of 33% over the five-year period
that began in 2000.
There
is also a lot of passion and different beliefs
as to what our country is really about.
It’s
quite interesting actually. From my casual
observations, I would say that most people say
things like: America is great because of its
freedoms. America is great because anybody can
achieve their dream if they try hard enough.
It’s the land of opportunity. It’s a nation
based on strong democratic principles,
humanistic values, religious freedom, and
tolerance.
That’s
about where the conversation ends. Then the
interpretation of what exactly that means is as
varied as the number of people who hold the
opinion.
I
think what we are witnessing is a clash of
ideologies. Not only politically, but
philosophically.
The
United States has always borne an internal
dichotomy in that it has a dual tradition of
isolationism and international outreach that has
varied over the centuries from different
versions of imperialism – military, economic and
cultural – to the current stages of globalism
that are dominated by commerce, finance,
technology, science, the movement of people,
etc.
The
globalism piece is the tricky one because it
challenges the American psyche on some levels.
It
is an old story – the United States has always
had its own unique character as do all nations.
But, because of its distance from most nations
with the exception of its immediate neighbors:
Canada, Mexico and the islands of the Caribbean
– it has been able to maintain a certain amount
of distance from the rest of the world – ergo
the isolationism.
The
hot-button topic these past few months has been
centered on immigration. It has brought out a
cast of characters – politicos and pundits –
Minutemen and “We the People” who have been
proudly marching in the millions.
One
thing is clear – everybody has an opinion – we
all agree there is a challenge, but we’re not
quite sure how to solve it or what “solving it”
means.
On
the surface – depending on your opinion, it
seems easy enough. But the reality is far more
complex and requires careful study and a
balancing of priorities, both real and
perceived.
Perception
is just as critical as reality in this game.
Unfortunately, it is the perception component
that creates the greatest challenges in that it
often forces policy to be subsumed by politics
and procedures.
If
you have listened to the pundits, ie: Lou Dobbs
and Bill O’Reilly – you get a sense that our
world is caving in because of the illegal
immigrants who are breaking laws, not paying
taxes and driving up criminal behavior across
the nation.
If
you listen to the politicos – it’s not much
better. They are stolidly holding on to their
positions alternatively praying that the issue
will go away so that they can make it through
another election cycle without having to vote on
the issue, or joining with the pundits and
demonizing the immigrants, or standing up for
immigrants but with all kinds of caveats.
The
easiest pathway has been chosen by those who
rely on what is quickly becoming an old saw – we
need to work on border security and then we’ll
do something about the immigrant situation.
That’s just a delaying tactic that the media
savvy Communications Director is giving the
member so as not to have to take clear positions
or express opinions that might be troubling to
the voter.
Nowhere
in the conversation are we discussing why we
have this immigration challenge. There is
discussion about push and pull factors, but
these are not really examined very closely or
given much weight. It adds to the complexity
and we are looking for quick fixes.
The
reality is that there are no quick fixes. There
are a variety of levels to the problem and I’ll
just mention a few right now.
First
- the bureaucracy is broken. It needs to be
fixed. It takes too long to have your
documentation processed. So, we have horrible
backlogs.
Second
– resources are stretched thin. The fines and
fees paid by any immigrant or guest worker are
not necessarily applied fully to the processing
of those immigrants and guest workers – in fact,
most of the money goes to the law enforcement
aspects.
Third,
the mood in the country is polarized. If you
support immigration, you are immediately labeled
a radical or a lefty. If you don’t support
immigration, you are immediately labeled a
racist. It creates sticking points in the
conversation.
Fourth,
there are undocumented people in the country and
the nation feels uncomfortable about it
especially because issues like language,
national anthems, flags, etc. – in other words
the “symbols” of the United States are
apparently under siege.
Fifth
– nowhere are we really having a frank dialogue
about: What is social justice? How do we reach
out to these individuals and help them become
successful Americans? And, how are we going to
create the dialogue so that our most beautiful
traditions and philosophies - humanistic values,
tolerance, and democracy prevail?
Our
goal should be building a stronger, more vibrant
and united America. I am an optimist. I know
that we can do this. But, first we must go back
to what our parents and teachers taught us.
We
must listen to one another and to try to find
common ground so that we can get over the hump
of polarization. We must agree to disagree and
find solutions that respect not only the
founding principles upon which the nation was
built, but also takes into account the “brave
new world” in which we live.
When
the Cold War ended – many other phenomena
happened as well. We saw the growth of
globalization via trade, commerce and finance.
We
witnessed with awe the creation of new
technologies and scientific discoveries (things
we now take for granted like the internet and
cell phones). Think about it. That’s relatively
new and only occurred in the last 20 years.
That’s a lot to absorb.
We
have also witnessed the growth of
non-traditional security threats like
transnational organized crime, diseases like Mad
Cow and the Bird Flu, drug traffickers, human
traffickers, global warming, terrorism, HIV/AIDS
to name a few.
So,
what to do? How do we balance this all out in
our hearts and minds?
Being
the optimist that I am. I think that we achieve
this by revisiting our nation’s principles of
social justice and humanitarianism; by reaching
out to one another as members of a community;
and by being vehicles of change and ambassadors
for understanding. Each and every one of us has
a role to play.
We
should never make decisions based on fear and
emotions. Invariably, the outcome will be
misguided and have impacts that are not always
intended.
The
world is small and we are all a part of it. If
anything, the immigration debate has
demonstrated that. How we choose to act from
this day forward will make the difference in how
we become a brighter, stronger more tolerant
nation.
I
thank you.
###
|